Wednesday, July 22, 2009

IRS Audit technique guides updated by industry

The IRS has updated several of its Audit Technique Guides that are used by auditors during exam. Guides on ministers, retail industries, child care providers, and hobbies have all been updated in 2009. The IRS is also planning to release a guide on casualty losses soon.
All of the Audit Technique Guides are available on the IRS website.

John R. Dundon, EA - www.1040.com/jd - Taxpayer Advocate - Enrolled with the United States Department of Treasury to Practice before the IRS - Direct phone # 720-234-1177

Thursday, July 16, 2009

S Corp Stock and Debt Basis

S Corporation Shareholders are Required to Compute Both Stock and Debt Basis

The amount of a shareholder’s stock and debt basis is very important. Unlike a C corporation, each year the stock and/or debt basis of an S corporation goes up and/or down based upon the S corporation’s operations. The S corporation will issue a shareholder a Schedule K-1.

It is important to understand that the K-1 reflects the S corporation’s income, loss and deductions which are allocated to the shareholder for the year. The K-1 does not state the taxable amount of the distribution. The taxable amount of distribution is contingent on the shareholder’s stock basis. It is not the corporation’s responsibility to track a shareholder’s stock and debt basis rather it is the shareholder’s responsibility.

If a shareholder receives a non-dividend distribution from an S corporation, the distribution is tax-free to the extent it does not exceed the shareholder’s stock basis.

Losses or Deduction Flow-Through

If a shareholder is allocated an S corporation loss or deduction flow-through, the shareholder must first have adequate stock and/or debt basis to claim that loss and/or deduction. In addition, it is important to remember, that even when the shareholder has adequate stock and debt basis to claim the S corporation loss or deduction, the shareholder must also consider at-risk limitations and passive activity limitations and therefore may not be able to claim the loss and/or deduction.

Computing Stock Basis

In computing stock basis, the shareholder starts with the initial capital contribution to the S corporation or the initial cost of the stock purchased (the same as a C corporation). That amount is then increased and/or decreased based on the flow-through amounts from the S corporation. An income item will increase stock basis while a loss, deduction or distribution will decrease stock basis.

The order in which stock basis is increased or decreased is important. Since both the taxability of a distribution and the deductibility of a loss are dependant on stock basis, there is an ordering rule in computing stock basis. Stock basis is adjusted annually, as of the last day of the S corporation year, in the following order:

Increased for income items and excess depletion;
Decreased for distributions;
Decreased for non-deductible, non-capital expenses and depletion; and
Decreased for items of loss and deduction.

When determining the taxability of a non-dividend distribution the shareholder looks solely to his/her stock basis (debt basis is not considered).

For losses and deductions which exceed a shareholder’s stock basis, the shareholder is allowed to deduct the excess up to the shareholder’s basis in loans personally made to the S corporation.

Debt basis is computed similarly to stock basis but there are some differences.

If a shareholder has S corporation losses and deductions in excess of stock basis and those losses and deductions are claimed based on debt basis, the debt basis of the shareholder will be reduced by the claimed losses and deductions.

If an S corporation repays reduced basis debt to the shareholder, part or all of the repayment is taxable to the shareholder.

Important Things You Should Know:

A non-dividend distribution in excess of stock basis is taxed as a capital gain on the shareholder’s personal return, usually a long-term capital gain (LTCG).

Non-deductible expenses reduce a shareholder’s stock and debt basis before loss and deduction items. If non-deductible expenses exceed basis, they do not get carried forward.

If the current year has different types of losses and deductions, which exceed stock and debt basis, the allowable losses and deductions must be allocated pro rata based on the size of the particular loss and deduction items.

A shareholder is not allowed to claim losses and deductions in excess of stock and debt basis. Losses and deductions not allowable in the current year are suspended due to basis limitations.
Suspended losses and deductions due to basis limitations retain their character in subsequent years. Any suspended losses or deductions in excess of stock and debt basis are carried forward indefinitely until basis is increased in subsequent years or the shareholder disposes of the stock

In determining current year allowable losses, current year loss and deduction items are combined with the suspended losses and deductions carried over from the prior year, though the current year and suspended items should be separately stated on the Form 1040 Schedule E or other appropriate schedule on the return.

A shareholder is only allowed debt basis to the extent he or she has personally lent money to the S corporation. A loan guarantee is not sufficient to allow the shareholder debt basis.
If a shareholder contends he or she has contributed or loaned substantial funds to the S corporation, consideration should be given to whether the shareholder had the financial means to make the contribution or loan.

Part or all of the repayment of a reduced basis debt is taxable to the shareholder.

If stock is sold, suspended losses due to basis limitations are lost. The sales price does not have an impact on the stock basis. A stock basis computation should be reviewed in the year stock is sold or disposed of.

John R. Dundon, EA - www.1040.com/jd - Taxpayer Advocate - Enrolled with the United States Department of Treasury to Practice before the IRS - Direct phone # 720-234-1177

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Why Not a 0% Tax Rate for the Bottom 60%?

Op-ed in today's Wall Street Journal: The 0% Tax Rate Solution: It's Better Policy, and Politics, Than the Proliferation of Tax Credits, by Peter Ferrara (Institute for Policy Innovation):

The federal income tax code is now so mangled that we can probably increase federal revenues with a 0% income tax rate for a majority of Americans. Long before President Barack Obama took office, the bottom 40% of income earners paid no federal income taxes.

Because of refundable income tax credits like the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), in 2006 these bottom 40% as a group actually received net payments equal to 3.6% of total income tax revenues, according to the latest Congressional Budget Office data. The actual middle class, the middle 20% of income earners, pay only 4.4% of total federal income tax revenues. That means the bottom 60% together pay less than 1% of income tax revenues. ...

But what if Republicans proposed a federal tax reform with a 0% income tax rate for the bottom 60% of income earners? With that explicit 0% tax rate framing the issue, abolishing the refundable tax credits that actually ship money to lower income earners through the tax code would become politically viable. Trading an explicit 0% tax rate for the bottom 60% in return for eliminating the refundable tax credits would likely be at least revenue neutral, and probably result in a net increase in revenue.

John R. Dundon, EA - www.1040.com/jd - Taxpayer Advocate - Enrolled with the United States Department of Treasury to Practice before the IRS - Direct phone # 720-234-1177

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

IRS Oversight Board seeking IRS funding increase

The IRS Oversight Board yesterday released its FY2010 IRS Budget Recommendation Special Report. From the press release:

The IRS Oversight Board recommends an FY2010 IRS budget of $12.489 billion, an increase of $966 million over the enacted FY2009 amount of $11.523 billion. This recommendation is $363 million above the President’s request of $12.126 billion.

As the Board stated in its 2008 Annual Report to Congress, our tax administration system has two serious weaknesses, the $290 billion tax gap and the archaic nature of IRS information systems. As a result, the Board recommends that strengthening the system be a national priority.

John R. Dundon, EA - www.1040.com/jd - Taxpayer Advocate - Enrolled with the United States Department of Treasury to Practice before the IRS - Under contract with the United States Department of Treasury as a Certified ITIN Acceptance Agent - Direct phone # 720-234-1177